Thursday, February 6, 2020

What Does Equality for Crippled Assholes Look Like?



Okay so here’s an ethical dilemma for us all to chew on. Suppose there’s some superstar basketball player like LeBron James. And suppose, seated courtside in the prime seats, is a vicious heckler. And I mean this is the most foul-mouthed, offensive, sonuvabitch of a heckler anybody ever heard. Every time LeBron passes by, he spews venom. He talks about his mama.

So here’s my question: At what point would LeBron be justified going into the stands and throttling that person? But hold on before you answer. Suppose that heckler is a Down Syndrome person or maybe somebody who’s blind. Does that change your answer? Should it?

I know it’s hard to picture a Down Syndrome person or somebody who’s blind as a vicious courtside heckler. It’s like trying to picture someone who blind or a Down Syndrome person on a wanted poster. You just don’t ever see that kind of thing. But why not? It reminds me of that TV show that I never watch where the protagonist is a woman who is chief of police in Los Angeles. It makes me wonder why I can’t think of a real-life female chief of police. It’s not like women are inherently incapable of being chiefs of police. They just haven’t had the opportunity. They’ve been pressured to play a limited role. It’s the same way with blind people and especially Down Syndrome people. The only way Down Syndrome people are allowed to present themselves in public is as sweet and cute and lovable. They aren’t inherently incapable of being a vicious heckler or ending up on a wanted poster. They just haven’t had the opportunity. They’ve been pressured to play a limited role.

So imagine we live in a utopian society that so teeming with genuine equal opportunity that a blind person or a Down Syndrome person could end up on a wanted poster or heckling courtside as easily as anyone else. That brings us back to our ethical question: At what point would LeBron be justified going into the stands and throttling that person? Should he hold back just because the foul-mouthed asshole is crippled? Should he cut a crippled asshole any additional slack? If LeBron went into the stands and throttled a blind or Down Syndrome-having sonuvabitch, he’d probably be fined and suspended ten times harder than if he throttled a regular Joe. Is that fair? Isn’t throttling us without prejudice when we deserve it the proper way for him to show respect and solidarity for cripple equality? Or not?

Discuss.


(Smart Ass Cripple is completely reader supported. Purchasing Smart Ass Cripple books at lulu.com and filling the tip jar keeps us going. Please help if you can.)





4 comments:

  1. This is going to keep me up tonight!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Personally, my disabilities make me much more susceptible to serious injury from minor incidents. In many places, penalities are much more severe for done anything against a "vulnerable" person. I agree with those rules. You never know what sorry of physical issues a person has, and they're more likely to have them if they have any disability.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your question presupposes the justification of throttling a disabled person. If one is a pacifist or Gandhi-follower, no throttling would occur. I'm not a spectator sport person, but wouldn't Le Bron be justified in having security extricate the offender regardless if the heckler had a disability or not?

    ReplyDelete
  4. LeBron is a fuckin' millionaire. He's got no right to be throttling anyone. If his feelings get hurt, he's got a mansion to drive back to in an Escalade where he can go cry in his marble jacuzzi. If he accidentally knocked me over I would sue his rich ass to Kingdom Come and he'd have to take it. Now who's vulnerable?

    ReplyDelete